NetSec-Analyst Latest Exam Review, Test NetSec-Analyst Tutorials
P.S. Free 2025 Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BraindumpsPass: https://drive.google.com/open?id=18ZGHADNqunTdc1-hWk7QyGzM0hv3gjX5
Our NetSec-Analyst exam questions are so popular among the candidates not only because that the qulity of the NetSec-Analyst study braidumps is the best in the market. But also because that our after-sales service can be the most attractive project in our NetSec-Analyst Preparation questions. We have free online service which means that if you have any trouble, we can provide help for you remotely in the shortest time. And we will give you the best advices on the NetSec-Analyst practice engine.
Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
>> NetSec-Analyst Latest Exam Review <<
Test NetSec-Analyst Tutorials - Exam NetSec-Analyst Fees
Our materials can make you master the best NetSec-Analyst questions torrent in the shortest time and save your much time and energy to complete other thing. What most important is that our NetSec-Analyst study materials can be download, installed and used safe. We can guarantee to you that there no virus in our product. Not only that, we also provide the best service and the best NetSec-Analyst Exam Torrent to you and we can guarantee that the quality of our NetSec-Analyst learning dump is good. So please take it easy after the purchase and we won’t let your money be wasted.
Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Sample Questions (Q159-Q164):
NEW QUESTION # 159
An enterprise is deploying a new containerized application infrastructure, using Kubernetes, exposed via a dedicated load balancer that sits behind a Palo Alto Networks firewall. The security team anticipates a very high, burstable volume of legitimate traffic, but also expects sophisticated HTTP/2-based DoS attacks that exploit the protocol's multiplexing capabilities and header compression. The firewall needs to detect and mitigate these without impacting legitimate, high-concurrency connections. Given that standard HTTP/I .1 flood protection might be insufficient, what advanced DoS profile configurations should be prioritized for the Palo Alto Networks firewall to protect this environment, assuming HTTP/2 inspection is enabled?
Answer: E
Explanation:
This is a very specific scenario targeting HTTP/2 vulnerabilities. Standard HTTP/I .1 rate limiting (A, B, C partially) might not be enough because HTTP/2 multiplexing means many logical streams (requests) can occur over a single TCP connection, potentially bypassing 'Per-session' limits. HTTP/2 also has vulnerabilities like 'HPACK Bomb' (excessive header size/count) and slow stream processing. Option E directly addresses these: 1. Target rules for load balancer IPs: Ensures protection is focused. 2. HTTP Flood protection: General HTTP volume. 3. HTTP Header Length and HTTP Header Count: These are CRITICAL for detecting HTTP/2-specific attacks like 'HPACK Bomb' which exploit header compression to consume resources with small packet sizes. This is an advanced feature not present in basic HTTP flood protection. 4. Client Read Timeout: Essential for slow HTTP/2 stream attacks. 5. Action: Protect: Provides a controlled response (e.g., reset stream) rather than outright blocking, minimizing impact on legitimate connections. Option C is close but misses the specific HTTP/2 header-based protections which are vital. Option A incorrectly suggests Syn-Cookie for HTTP and is too simplistic. Option B is too generic. Option D is less granular and reactive. Option E provides the most comprehensive and targeted defense for HTTP/2 DoS.
NEW QUESTION # 160
Consider a large-scale network migration where an organization is transitioning thousands of physical Palo Alto Networks firewalls to a mix of physical and virtual firewalls, all to be managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM). The migration plan involves frequent, scheduled policy updates across different device groups. How can an administrator programmatically automate the policy update process and verify successful deployment for multiple device groups using SCM's API?
Answer: B
Explanation:
SCM's robust RESTful API is designed for programmatic interaction and automation. For a large-scale migration, a Python script (or similar) can be developed to: 1. Authenticate with SCM API. 2. Construct policy update payloads. 3. Send API requests to push policies to specific device groups. 4. Poll SCM's API for job status (commit and push operations) to verify successful deployment across all targeted firewalls. This method provides scalability, automation, and verifiable deployment, which is crucial for large migrations.
NEW QUESTION # 161
A Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst notices a pattern of 'DNS sinkhole' logs in the Log Viewer. These logs indicate internal hosts attempting to resolve known malicious domains, and the firewall is successfully redirecting these requests to the configured sinkhole IP. However, no corresponding 'critical' or 'high' severity alerts are appearing on the Incidents and Alerts page, despite the potential severity of internal compromise. What configuration element is MOST likely missing or misconfigured that would prevent these sinkhole events from generating an incident?
Answer: A
Explanation:
DNS Sinkholing is a feature of the Anti-Spyware profile. For DNS sinkhole events to generate alerts and incidents, the Anti-Spyware profile applied to the security policy allowing the DNS traffic must be configured to take an 'alert' or 'block' action when a DNS sinkhole event occurs. If the action is set to 'default' and the default does not include alerting, or if it's set to 'allow' without logging an alert, then no incident will be generated, even if the sinkholing itself is successful and logged. Option A is incorrect because sinkholing is occurring and logs are generated. Option C is plausible if no threat logs were generated at all, but here logs exist, just not alerts. Option D is irrelevant to basic DNS sinkhole alerting. Option E affects logging, but not the generation of an alert from a security profile's action.
NEW QUESTION # 162
How are Application Fillers or Application Groups used in firewall policy?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 163
A security architect is designing a highly automated incident response workflow using Palo Alto Networks Panorama and external SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) platform. The workflow needs to dynamically quarantine compromised endpoints by adding their IP addresses to a 'Quarantine' Dynamic Address Group (DAG) on Panoram a. The DAG then triggers a block policy. Which of the following code snippets (or API calls) demonstrates the correct and most efficient method for a SOAR platform to add an IP address to an existing DAG via Panorama's XML API?
Answer: E
Explanation:
To add an IP address to a Dynamic Address Group (DAG) in Palo Alto Networks, you typically create an 'address object with a specific 'tag' , and the DAG is configured to match on that 'tag'. The most efficient way for a SOAR platform is to create a new address object (often with a unique name for the IP) and apply the correct tag that the DAG is listening for. This is followed by a 'commit' to make the change active. Let's break down the options: A: This attempts to add a static member to an 'address-group'. DAGs are not populated by static members directly added to the group definition. They are populated by matching tags on address objects. B: This attempts to set a 'tag' directly on an 'address-group' named 'Quarantine'. This is not how DAGs are dynamically populated. The 'tag' element within an address-group definition specifies the criteria for dynamic population, not the IP itself. C: This is for log forwarding profiles, completely unrelated to address objects or groups. D: This attempts to add a member directly under the 'tag' element of an address group, which is structurally incorrect for creating an address object with a tag that a DAG consumes. E: This is the correct and most granular approach. It first creates an 'address' object (e.g., 'quarantined-ip-10.1.1. I(Y) with the specific IP ('10.1.1.10/32') and crucially assigns a 'tag' (e.g., 'QuarantineTag') to it. Your pre- existing Dynamic Address Group 'Quarantine' would be configured to include all addresses tagged with 'QuarantineTag'. This automatically adds the IP to the DAG. The subsequent 'commit' command pushes the changes to the firewall, making the new address object and its tag visible to the DAG and thus activating the blocking policy. This is the standard, programmatic way to interact with DAGs via API.
NEW QUESTION # 164
......
The price for NetSec-Analyst study materials is quite reasonable, no matter you are a student at school or an employee in the company, you can afford it. Just think that you just need to spend some money, you can get the certificate. What’s more, NetSec-Analyst exam materials are compiled by skilled professionals, and they cover the most knowledge points and will help you pass the exam successfully. We have online and offline chat service stuff, they have the professional knowledge about NetSec-Analyst Exam Dumps, and you can have a chat with them if you have any questions.
Test NetSec-Analyst Tutorials: https://www.braindumpspass.com/Palo-Alto-Networks/NetSec-Analyst-practice-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest BraindumpsPass NetSec-Analyst PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=18ZGHADNqunTdc1-hWk7QyGzM0hv3gjX5